Status of the Courts

Adapted from an article by ernie the “natural man” of the ancient oaks. See the Centerfold of July-Ang 2017 issue – THE AMERICAN’S BULLETIN 

To analyze the status of the Courts in America, we have to lay a foundation before we can attempt to analyze the house, where all names are CAPITALIZED as a dead man, or cursed.

Over a period of time, between 1621 when the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock, and 1789 when the Constitution was completed and ratified on December 15, the “wrighting” of the Ship of State called America took place.

When I say “wrighting”, putting a “w” in front of the word “right”, wrighting means to build; to craft; to create. The wrighting of a ship, e.g. the building of it. The ship known as America was created during this period of time, and it was not built to be a rogue ship just floating free. An anchor was created for the ship. That anchor was and is the Constitution for the united States of America, in 1789.

A chain must necessarily run from the ship to the anchor or the anchor will be of no benefit to the ship and the ship will never be able to be held in a safe harbor. That chain is Article VI in the 1789 American Constitution, which necessarily binds all of Congress, and every Judge, and every State or territory, as restraints, to the 1789 Constitution and the Amendments that followed.

Nowhere is there any allowance made in the body of that contractual Constitution for breakage of that anchor-chain. Whoever seeks to break that chain, seeks to commit a contractual breach, and Fraud and unconstitutional standing will be the result.

This is why the three-word phrase “notwithstanding” is the “sumnus conclusus” of Article VI. It says, “. . . any thing in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.” This means that anything in the constitution of any State that is contrary to the 1789 Constitution does not have standing.

This is recorded in the Congressional Record of 1864 on the 30th of June, in the 13th Statute, 223 to 306, Chapter 173, Section 182.

On the 30th of June in 1864, Congress, acting as if it were Lords of parliament, subverted the American constitutional judicial program and process, in symbolic continuation of the star chambers of England, as if they were supreme over American landowners; and broke that chain.

The star chambers of England is an Admiralty court. And because the Founders based their own forms on what they were familiar with, which was English admiralty law — while there is a place for it and it’s currently outlined in the Constitution– it is not endemic; it is not a court to be operated upon the land — it has legs; it has restraints; and it is unconstitutional to alienate those restraints; to breach that trust; to break that chain.

So when you go to what you think is a court, today, you are going to a star chamber of England.

THE ANCHOR’S CHAIN

U.S. Constitution › Article VI

All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

 

About David Robinson

REVISED: David Robinson is an Author and Journalist living in the mid-coast area of Maine. He is a Graduate and Alumni of the Brunswick Police Academy. He served as a JUROR seated on the Cumberland County, Maine, Grand Jury for the first four-month session of 2014. Publisher Robinson served 3 months of a 4-month sentence for Conspiracy to defraud the United States, at the FCI Berlin minimum security Satellite Camp in Berlin New Hampshire, as retaliation after he and a friend sued the IRS, unsuccessfully, for Unfair Trade Practices, under Title 15 of the US Code. +++ Maine Lawsuit Against The IRS: For Unfair Trade Practices (http://tinyurl.com/hm8gdls) +++ Failure to File & Conspiracy: United States vs. Messier & Robinson - No. 2:14-cr-00083-DBH (http://tinyurl.com/gwdyaps) +++ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Maine / REPLY BRIEF OF ROBINSON (http://tinyurl.com/zyp9f3x) +++ Books by David E. Robinson (http://tinyurl.com/zrr9bxb)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s