Anyone who claims to be a Continental Marshal better read this before you end up imprisoned or dead!

A Marshal is the highest ranking officer of military police! If you did not become a MP in the military service and have rank promoted to Marshal, then you are in violation of Lieber code and punishable in a military court. Please read the information at this link.

All American DeFacto courts are military courts. This is why any military rank above Sargent (if I remember right) can arrest a judge.

Abraham Lincoln declared General Order 100 in 1863 that put America under Lieber Code Military Jurisdiction and Marshal Law and Lincoln was Assassinated before he could end General order 100 revoking Lieber Code laws applying to the 50 nation=states. The title “Marshal” is a military office! Stop using “Continental Marshals” title immediately before you are arrested for impersonating a military law enforcement officer!

You people trying to claim particular duties that belong to the state’s militias by declaring yourselves as Continental Marshals are putting yourselves in serious danger!

You may look up the definitions for “marshal” and you will find what I found and read. You will find some entries under civilian areas and also those areas are under Lieber Code. It is still military.

 F. Lieber
A. Lincoln

Laws and Treaties Protecting Cultural Property

The Lieber Code of 1863

Early in the 19th century, Chief Justice Marshall noted that sovereign nations had the right to confiscate property of an enemy during armed conflict, but the Lieber Code of 1863, formally known as General Order No. 100, reversed that notion by incorporating the principle that monuments, places of worship and works of art must be spared from destruction in times of war. The code, commissioned by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, was published as a pamphlet that could be carried by Union soldiers. Written by Professor Francis Lieber of Columbia College (now Columbia University), it provided that “classical works of art, libraries, scientific collections, or precious instruments . . . must be secured against all avoidable injury” (Article 35).

The Lieber Code also identified military necessity for the first time as a general legal principle whose purpose was to limit violence. Article 14 of the Lieber Code states, “Military necessity, as understood by modern civilized nations, consists in the necessity of those measures which are indispensable for securing the ends of the war, and which are lawful according to the modern law and usages of war,” i.e., military necessity permits only that degree of force necessary to defeat the enemy. Although some have pointed to military necessity as justification for the destruction of an enemy’s property, e.g. defendants in the Nuremberg trials following WWII, it does not justify the willful or wanton destruction, not justified by imperative military necessity.
The Brussels Declaration of 1874, as well as the Hague Regulations on the Laws and Customs of War on Land of 1899 and 1907 (Link to the 1899 and 1907 page), are partially based on the Lieber Code and retain the principle that cultural property should be protected in times of armed conflict.
Full text of the Lieber Code »
See in particular, Article II Sections 34-36 where the protection of cultural property is mandated.

About David Robinson

REVISED: David Robinson is an Author and Journalist living in the mid-coast area of Maine. He is a Graduate and Alumni of the Brunswick Police Academy. He served as a JUROR seated on the Cumberland County, Maine, Grand Jury for the first four-month session of 2014. Publisher Robinson served 3 months of a 4-month sentence for Conspiracy to defraud the United States, at the FCI Berlin minimum security Satellite Camp in Berlin New Hampshire, as retaliation after he and a friend sued the IRS, unsuccessfully, for Unfair Trade Practices, under Title 15 of the US Code. +++ Maine Lawsuit Against The IRS: For Unfair Trade Practices ( +++ Failure to File & Conspiracy: United States vs. Messier & Robinson - No. 2:14-cr-00083-DBH ( +++ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Maine / REPLY BRIEF OF ROBINSON ( +++ Books by David E. Robinson (
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s