Judge Anna von Reitz
I just read this today. It was posted as part of a comment to one of my posts on my wall with a heading of “Wake Up”—and now I can’t locate it to save me. It was from a blog/website and I am sorry I can’t credit the writer (come out, come out, wherever you are!) at this point, but this is hands down, the best, most concise explanation of the IRS fraud I have ever seen in forty years of discussing it. It is simply too good not to share:
In the IRS operating manual, under the section that pertains to estates and trusts, the IRS defines an “infant” as a “decedent”.
When one gets a job they fill out an IRS tax reporting form called a W4 form. You write in the legal name which legal name is being identified as the “taxpayer”.
The IRS Code Manual identifies the W4 Form as being a Class 5 Tax form.
The same IRS Code manual identifies a Class 5 Tax as ONLY being a GIFT AND ESTATE TAX.
The IRS identifies the 1040 Tax Form as a Class 2 Tax and they identify a Class 2 Tax as being “Income Tax”.
So the W4, the W2, all 1099 forms, the 1098 form, in addition to other tax forms, are all identified solely as being a Class 5 Tax Form which Class 5 Tax is identified solely as GIFT AND ESTATE TAX.
The IRS Notice of Federal Tax Lien form has a column that says “KIND OF TAX”.
Note; This specifically says KIND of TAX, not what kind of tax FORM, but actually the KIND OF TAX they have a lien for.
The actual KIND of Tax they have listed in that column says “1040” as being the specific KIND of Tax that is owed by the taxpayer which is the legal name they have named on that form.
The “1040” KIND of Tax pertains to Title 26 section 1040
Title 26, section 1040, SOLELY pertains only to Trusts and Estates and nothing else.
So the IRS is specifically identifying the legal name as BEING AN ESTATE which is the taxpayer that owes an ESTATE TAX.
The State creates an “infant” which IRS identifies as being a “decedent” under a section pertaining to Estates, where the State registers the infant decedent ESTATE as a registered organization of the State where the infant decedent ESTATE then becomes an agency of the State by the State having registered that ESTATE as a State organization pursuant to Article 9 of the UCC.
That registered infant decedent which is an ESTATE is registered with the State as an organization which is an estate, and thereby becomes an agency of the State which is the estate, and the State holds title to that Estate and becomes the Administrator and usufructary of that Estate, and the United States becomes the beneficial-owner of all the interests in that State registered estate organization, and the living man the State issues their Certified COPY of the Certificate of Title to that State registered ESTATE organization, becomes the “naked-owner” who only has full disposal rights to USE, POSSESS and CONTROL [dominion] all actual property, while United States receives all the “VALUE” in the Name Estate as the beneficial-owner, while the State acts as Administrator and Usufructary of the Name Estate.
Nan Diamond True, but you have to look at the W-4 OMB No. 1575-0074 which is tied to the 1040 form U.S. Individual (Citizen) Income Tax Return. Now look at the IRS Form 1041 U.S. Estate and Gift Tax Return 1575 0092 which is for returning the federal gifts (grants) back to the JOHN DOE TRUST ESTATE by John Doe, as Administrator/Settlor. The W-4 used to have a different OMB NO. which was only for federal employees, but their fraud scam wouldn’t work unless tied to the 1040 so it was changed just like they change, amend, and delete everything else once we catch on to their evil ways. The fraudulent form W-4 also refers to being an employee which would mean we would have to be ABC COMPANY corporate employee and be on the board of directors or be stakeholders or stockholders in their corporation…not! The corporations are more afraid of the IRS than they are of their private workers so they keep perpetuating the fraud through their BAR attorney representative who makes certain the corporation is complicit with IRS codes, ad nauseum.
Brad Haas Regardless of all that. Does anyone have any evidence that we are person(s) as defined by their codes that are liable for [TAXES]???