Was Hillary Clinton Fed Information In the Trump Debate?

For those who happened to watch the Trump Clinton Debate, or care to rewatch it, you will notice something that others noted.  Mrs. Clinton was speaking in sentences which seemed to be as if someone was reading them to her in a translation.

If you recall or rewatch this debate, Mrs. Clinton began the debate by blinking oddly as if she was trying to focus. Later in the debate, her eyes kept shifting left as if she was reading something. Still later in the debate, her eyes were opening extremely wide.

Now, what would cause that reaction?

This is beyond, as this blog stated, that Mrs. Clinton had the questions before the debate and has had them for some time.

Now for the first time, lamecherry.blogspot.com explains what Mrs. Clinton was reacting to. She did not have an earwig, as in the first debate, but instead had an advanced-in-production contact lens which was literally running like a teleprompter.

This is why the sentences were in bursts and complete. It was the exact pattern of a United Nations translator, which everyone has heard when you are being fed one line of information and you have to speak it.

This is termed augmented contact lenses, which are in production, and which DARPA has been developing, along with even more advanced systems, for years.

About David Robinson

REVISED: David Robinson is an Author and Journalist living in the mid-coast area of Maine. He is a Graduate and Alumni of the Brunswick Police Academy. He served as a JUROR seated on the Cumberland County, Maine, Grand Jury for the first four-month session of 2014. Publisher Robinson served 3 months of a 4-month sentence for Conspiracy to defraud the United States, at the FCI Berlin minimum security Satellite Camp in Berlin New Hampshire, as retaliation after he and a friend sued the IRS, unsuccessfully, for Unfair Trade Practices, under Title 15 of the US Code. +++ Maine Lawsuit Against The IRS: For Unfair Trade Practices (http://tinyurl.com/hm8gdls) +++ Failure to File & Conspiracy: United States vs. Messier & Robinson - No. 2:14-cr-00083-DBH (http://tinyurl.com/gwdyaps) +++ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Maine / REPLY BRIEF OF ROBINSON (http://tinyurl.com/zyp9f3x) +++ Books by David E. Robinson (http://tinyurl.com/zrr9bxb)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s